As I wrote in my response to EDIT: the article you linked to (not by you):

You (the author of the article) should credit the stock archive I got the photo from. Also, so you are aware, it’s just the best looking photo of guns they had on there, and for the record, I didn’t talk about the relationship between the weapons at all. I’m happy you found something to focus on, but I’d rather it be the rest of the article.

Nice job derailing, ignoring the point of the article, and focusing on BS you just decided my article was about, though. Really, top notch. Anyone reading this would think that the piece I wrote was about how those guns were the same, not about how you are fundamentally wrong in how you read the right to bear arms.